Prizes, Awards and Fellowships: Section 74 and 117 Tax Rules for Freelancers (2026)

Published: October 6, 2026 · Reading time: 12 min

TL;DR: A prize is taxable by default. §74(a) puts "amounts received as prizes and awards" in gross income, and the one real exclusion, §74(b), is narrower than most winners hope: you must have been chosen without entering, owe no substantial future services, and have the payer send the money to a charity you designate. You never touch the cash. §117 excludes fellowship money only for a degree candidate, and only for required tuition, fees, books and supplies. §74(b) also requires that the award recognize religious, charitable, scientific, educational, artistic, literary or civic achievement. In our 2026 example, a $15,000 prize unrelated to her business adds $1,665.07 of federal tax for a single freelancer who keeps it, and still adds $1,489.07 if she takes it and gives all of it to charity. If the §74(b) route was open, it adds $0. If the prize is business income instead, which is the likelier result for a prize from a competition in her own trade, it adds $3,597.99.


Why This Is a Strategy Question, Not Just a Reporting Question

Most freelance tax content is about expenses. Prizes, awards, juried-competition money and fellowships are the opposite problem: money arrives that you did not invoice, often with no withholding and sometimes with no form at all. Photographers win contests, writers get literary prizes, illustrators and filmmakers get residencies and fellowships, and designers win competitions run by trade groups.

The tax rules for that money contain exactly one door that lets a winner avoid income, and the door has a lock most people never try. If you know about it before the award is presented, you may have a choice. If you learn about it after you have deposited the check, you do not.

This guide covers the two statutes, what each one grants, what winners assume they grant, and a worked 2026 example that prices the choices. For the broader question of grants paid to a business, see Are Business Grants Taxable?, which this post does not repeat.


The Default Rule: §74(a)

The starting point is one sentence. §74(a) reads:

"Except as otherwise provided in this section or in section 117 (relating to qualified scholarships), gross income includes amounts received as prizes and awards."

How this was verified: the text of 26 U.S.C. §74 was fetched raw from Cornell LII to a temporary file and searched for the exact string after normalising whitespace and punctuation.

IRS Publication 525 applies it in plain terms: "If you win a prize in a lucky number drawing, television or radio quiz program, beauty contest, or other event, you must include it in your income. For example, if you win a $50 prize in a photography contest, you must report this income on Schedule 1 (Form 1040), line 8i." It adds that "Prizes and awards in goods or services must be included in your income at their FMV," and that "If you refuse to accept a prize, don't include its value in your income."

Verified from the raw Publication 525 (2025) page, the "Prizes and awards" paragraph under Other Income.

Three practical consequences follow:

  • A prize in kind is income at fair market value. A camera body, a studio residency or a trip is taxed on what it was worth.
  • No form does not mean no income. Publication 525's instruction is to include the prize, whether or not anything was filed.
  • Refusing a prize is the one way to avoid income without a qualifying designation. It also means you do not get the prize.

The Exclusion: §74(b) and Its Three Conditions

§74(b) says gross income does not include prizes and awards "made primarily in recognition of religious, charitable, scientific, educational, artistic, literary, or civic achievement, but only if":

  1. "the recipient was selected without any action on his part to enter the contest or proceeding";
  2. "the recipient is not required to render substantial future services as a condition to receiving the prize or award"; and
  3. "the prize or award is transferred by the payor to a governmental unit or organization described in paragraph (1) or (2) of section 170(c) pursuant to a designation made by the recipient."

Verified verbatim against the raw Cornell LII text of §74(b)(1) through (3).

Read the third condition slowly. The exclusion is not "you may give the prize away." It is that the payor transfers it, to a charity or government unit you designated. The prize never becomes yours to spend. Publication 525, under the heading "Pulitzer, Nobel, and similar prizes," spells out the mechanics:

"You can't use the prize or award before it's transferred. You should provide the designation before the prize or award is presented to prevent a disqualifying use."

It then lists what the designation should contain: a reference to section 74(b)(3), a description of the prize or award, the name and address of the organization, your name, address and TIN, and your signature and the date. For a surprise presentation it says: "In the case of an unexpected presentation, you must return the prize or award before using it (or spending, depositing, or investing it, etc., in the case of money) and then prepare the statement . . . ."

Verified from the raw Publication 525 (2025) page; the TOC entry for the heading was skipped and the body occurrence read.

The payer-side instructions agree. The IRS instructions for Forms 1099-MISC and 1099-NEC say prizes and awards given in recognition of past accomplishments in those fields "are not reportable if" the winners are chosen without action on their part, are not expected to perform future services, and the payer transfers the prize to a charitable organization or governmental unit under a designation made by the recipient, and they cite Rev. Proc. 87-54.

What §74(b) grants, and what winners assume it grants

This is where the exclusion gets misread. A relief provision deems only what its text deems.

What §74(b) grantsWhat winners assume it grants
Exclusion of a recognition prize, if all three conditions are metExclusion of any prize you give away
Treatment of the prize as never received, because the payor sends it straight to the charityA way to take the money, deposit it, and exclude it afterward
Coverage for prizes made primarily in recognition of artistic, literary, educational and similar achievementCoverage for money won in a contest you entered, for a deliverable, or for work commissioned from you
A designation you control, among qualifying charities and government unitsAny recipient, including you, a business account or a family member

Notice what is not on the left. The exclusion does not reach:

  • A prize you applied or competed for. Condition (1) fails once you took action to enter. The statute gives no examples of what counts, so treat a competition entry or an application you filed as action, and ask whether you were chosen without having done anything.
  • A prize that comes with strings. A fellowship that requires a year of work product, a residency with required teaching, or a prize that obliges you to attend and perform fails condition (2) if the services are substantial.
  • A prize you kept. Condition (3) is the point of the provision. There is no half-way version in which you spend it and later reimburse a charity.
  • Payment for services. The Form 1099 instructions send prizes and awards for services performed by nonemployees to Form 1099-NEC box 1a, which is business compensation, not a recognition prize.

The "employee achievement" neighbour is not your door

§74(c) is a separate exclusion for an "employee achievement award (as defined in section 274(j))", and it is written around what the employer may deduct for the award. It is an employment-relationship rule. It is not a way to exclude a contest prize you won as an independent freelancer, so do not borrow its language for a §74(b) problem. §74(d) excludes Olympic and Paralympic medals and prize money from the United States Olympic Committee, and only for taxpayers whose AGI does not exceed $1,000,000. Neither is the §74(b) route this post prices.

All of §74(c) and (d) was read from the same raw fetch.


Fellowships and Scholarships: §117 Is a Student Rule

Freelance artists and writers often hear "fellowships are tax-free." That is true only for one kind of fellowship.

§117(a) excludes "any amount received as a qualified scholarship by an individual who is a candidate for a degree at an educational organization described in section 170(b)(1)(A)(ii)." Under §117(b), a qualified scholarship is a scholarship or fellowship grant "to the extent the individual establishes that, in accordance with the conditions of the grant, such amount was used for qualified tuition and related expenses," meaning tuition and fees required for enrollment or attendance, and "fees, books, supplies, and equipment required for courses of instruction."

Verified from the raw Cornell LII text of §117(a), (b)(1) and (b)(2).

§117(c)(1) then takes back anything that is pay: the exclusion "shall not apply to that portion of any amount received which represents payment for teaching, research, or other services by the student required as a condition for receiving the qualified scholarship or qualified tuition reduction." Publication 525 repeats the point and adds that "Amounts used for room and board don't qualify for the exclusion."

PaymentExcluded under §117?
Tuition and fees required for enrollment, paid to a degree candidateYes, to the extent used for that purpose
Books, supplies and equipment required of all students in the courseYes, if required for the courses
Room and board, travel, a living stipendNo
The part of a grant that pays for required teaching or researchNo (§117(c)(1))
A residency or fellowship paid to a freelancer who is not a degree candidateNo, §117 does not apply
A scholarship "prize" you may spend on anythingNo; Publication 525 sends it to Schedule 1, line 8i

If you are an MFA candidate, the tuition and required-supplies slice is protected and the stipend is not. If you are a working freelancer on a non-degree fellowship, none of it is protected by §117, and whether it is a business receipt (with expenses against it) or other income depends on your facts. The business grants guide and Schedule C Line 6 other income cover that classification.


Worked Example: A $15,000 Photography Prize (2026)

Dana is a single freelance photographer with no dependents. For 2026 her Schedule C net profit is $72,000. She has no other income, no health insurance or retirement deduction, and no itemizable deductions other than the charitable gifts the example describes. A foundation awards her $15,000 in cash for a short essay she wrote, a literary prize with no connection to her photography business.

The 2026 figures come from Rev. Proc. 2025-32 (standard deduction for an unmarried individual $16,100; 10% to $12,400, 12% to $50,400, 22% to $105,700 for single filers; §199A threshold $201,750) and from IRS Publication 15 (2026) for the Social Security wage base of $184,500. Each was read from the raw documents (the revenue procedure was converted with pdftotext and the tables read directly), not from a summary.

Her baseline, no prize:

  • Self-employment tax: $72,000 × 92.35% × 15.3% = $10,173.28. Half, $5,086.64, is deductible. The 92.35% reflects §1402(a)(12), which allows a deduction of one-half of the combined rates, and the $72,000 base is far below the wage base.
  • AGI: $72,000 − $5,086.64 = $66,913.36.
  • Taxable income before the QBI deduction: $66,913.36 − $16,100 = $50,813.36.
  • §199A: QBI is $72,000 − $5,086.64 = $66,913.36, so 20% is $13,382.67. Her taxable income is far below the $201,750 threshold, so the SSTB phase-out and the W-2 wage and property limit do not apply. The third limit, 20% of taxable income minus net capital gain, computed without subtracting the QBI deduction (§199A(e)(1)), is 20% × $50,813.36 = $10,162.67, and it is lower, so it binds. QBI deduction: $10,162.67.
  • Taxable income: $50,813.36 − $10,162.67 = $40,650.69.
  • Income tax: $1,240 + 12% × ($40,650.69 − $12,400) = $4,630.08.
  • Total federal income tax plus SE tax: $14,803.36.

The §199A figures were checked against the raw §199A(a) and (e) text: the deduction is the lesser of the combined QBI amount and 20 percent of the excess of taxable income over net capital gain, and "taxable income shall be computed ... without regard to any deduction allowable under this section."

Scenario 1: She entered a juried essay competition and keeps the money

Condition (1) fails, so §74(a) applies. Assume the prize is a recognition award with no tie to her photography business, reported on Schedule 1, line 8i, so there is no SE tax. A photographer who wins a photography competition is the opposite case, covered by the Schedule C variant below.

  • AGI: $66,913.36 + $15,000 = $81,913.36
  • Taxable income before QBI: $65,813.36
  • QBI deduction: the 20% of QBI is still $13,382.67, but the taxable-income cap rises to 20% × $65,813.36 = $13,162.67, which is still lower and still binds. The prize is not QBI, yet it lifts the cap, so her QBI deduction rises by exactly $3,000.
  • Taxable income: $65,813.36 − $13,162.67 = $52,650.69
  • Income tax: $5,800 + 22% × ($52,650.69 − $50,400) = $6,295.15
  • Added tax versus baseline: $1,665.07. Cash left after that tax: $15,000 − $1,665.07 = $13,334.93.

Do not put one percentage on this. The $15,000 added only $12,000 of taxable income, because the QBI cap absorbed $3,000. Of that $12,000, $9,749.31 landed in the 12% bracket ($1,169.92) and $2,250.69 crossed into the 22% bracket ($495.15). That is $1,665.07 in total, an average of 11.1% of the prize, which is neither 12% nor 22%. If her QBI had been the lower limit instead of the taxable-income cap, the prize would not have lifted the deduction and the tax would have been higher.

Scenario 2: She takes the prize and gives all $15,000 to a public charity

She does not itemize: $15,000 of charitable gifts is below her $16,100 standard deduction, and the example assumes she has no other itemizable deductions. For 2026, §170(p) gives a taxpayer who does not itemize a charitable deduction "not in excess of $1,000 ($2,000 in the case of a joint return)" for cash gifts to organizations described in section 170(b)(1)(A), excluding gifts to section 509(a)(3) organizations and gifts "for the establishment of a new, or maintenance of an existing, donor advised fund." (The non-itemizer deduction guide and the donor-advised fund post explain why a DAF gift does not qualify here.) The amendment applies to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2025.

Verified from the raw Cornell LII text of §170(p) and its effective-date note.

  • Deduction: $1,000. Taxable income before QBI: $65,813.36 − $1,000 = $64,813.36. Cap: 20% × $64,813.36 = $12,962.67.
  • Taxable income: $64,813.36 − $12,962.67 = $51,850.69.
  • Income tax: $5,800 + 22% × ($51,850.69 − $50,400) = $6,119.15.
  • Total tax: $16,292.43, which is $1,489.07 above baseline.

She gave away $15,000 and also paid $1,489.07 of tax on money she never kept, because only $1,000 of the gift reduced her income.

Scenario 3: She did not enter, owes no services, and the foundation pays the charity directly

Suppose the award recognizes literary achievement, all three §74(b) conditions are met and she signed the designation before the presentation. The prize is not income, there is nothing to deduct, and her tax equals baseline: $14,803.36. The charity receives the same $15,000 as in Scenario 2.

Side by side

Scenario 1: keep itScenario 2: take it and donateScenario 3: §74(b) designation
Prize in AGI$15,000$15,000$0
§170(p) deductionnone$1,000none
QBI deduction$13,162.67$12,962.67$10,162.67
Taxable income$52,650.69$51,850.69$40,650.69
Income tax$6,295.15$6,119.15$4,630.08
SE tax$10,173.28$10,173.28$10,173.28
Total tax$16,468.43$16,292.43$14,803.36
Change vs. no prize+$1,665.07+$1,489.07$0
Dana's cash+$13,334.93gives away $15,000gives away $0 of her own

The strategic reading: for a winner who wants the money to go to charity anyway, the §74(b) route is worth $1,489.07 here. For a winner who wants the money, it is irrelevant, because Scenario 3 is a gift to the charity of her choice, not income to her. And for the very common winner who entered, Scenario 3 does not exist.

If the prize is business income

Suppose the facts make the $15,000 a receipt of Dana's photography business, for example because it is payment for work or because she won it in a photography competition, which is the likelier result for a working photographer. Then it goes on Schedule C and net profit is $87,000:

  • SE tax: $87,000 × 92.35% × 15.3% = $12,292.71, which is $2,119.43 more than baseline.
  • Income tax: $6,108.64, which is $1,478.56 more than baseline (the prize is QBI and half the extra SE tax is deductible).
  • Total added: $3,597.99, against $1,665.07 for a line 8i prize.

The 15.3% applies in full because net earnings of $80,344.50 sit under the $184,500 wage base. The classification is a facts question, and §1402(c) says "trade or business" for self-employment purposes has the same meaning as in section 162. Do not choose the lower number because it is lower.

Every figure in this example was computed with a script and re-added: for instance $1,169.92 + $495.15 = $1,665.07, and $2,119.43 + $1,478.56 = $3,597.99.


Timing, Estimates and Paperwork

No withholding. A prize check usually arrives with nothing taken out. Add the computed tax to your next estimated payment, and read the estimated tax safe harbor guide for how much of last year's tax you can rely on. If the money lands in December, the annualized income installment method can keep earlier quarters from being penalized, because it measures income when it was earned rather than spreading it evenly.

The 1099. The IRS instructions for Forms 1099-MISC and 1099-NEC (12/2026) list prizes and awards of $2,000 or more for Form 1099-MISC and put "prizes and awards that are not for services performed" in box 3. They tell payers to report prizes and awards "for services performed by nonemployees" in box 1a of Form 1099-NEC instead. See 1099-NEC vs. 1099-MISC for the line between the two. A prize with no 1099 is still income under Publication 525.

Entry fees and costs. If a contest is part of how you market your business, the fees and shipping for entries are ordinary business costs on Schedule C. If a prize is a recognition award with no business tie, you should not assume the costs offset it, and deducting entry fees on Schedule C while reporting the same prize as non-business income is an inconsistent position. Keep receipts either way, and see the hobby-loss guide if the activity is thin.

State tax. Everything above is federal. States differ on whether they follow §74 and §117, and the worked example excludes state tax.


Common Mistakes to Avoid

  1. Believing you can exclude a prize by donating it. §74(b)(3) requires the payor to transfer it to a charity you designate. Taking and donating leaves it in income, and a non-itemizer deducts at most $1,000 ($2,000 joint) under §170(p).
  2. Forgetting that entering a contest kills the exclusion. §74(b)(1) requires that you were "selected without any action on his part."
  3. Depositing the check at a surprise presentation. Publication 525 says you must return the prize before using, spending or depositing it, then prepare the statement.
  4. Designating after the award is presented. Publication 525 says to provide the designation before the prize is presented.
  5. Assuming a fellowship is tax-free. §117 excludes only required tuition, fees, books, supplies and equipment, only for a degree candidate, and never room, board or pay for required services.
  6. Applying 22% (or any single rate) to the whole prize. In the example the prize straddled the 12% and 22% brackets and the QBI cap absorbed part of it.
  7. Treating a prize for your work as a recognition prize. If the payer is paying for services performed, it is Form 1099-NEC income with SE tax.
  8. Treating a missing 1099 as "no income." Publication 525's instruction is to include the prize.
  9. Computing QBI as 20% of profit without checking the taxable-income cap. The cap bound at every point in Dana's example.
  10. Putting a DAF gift in the non-itemizer deduction. §170(p) excludes donor advised fund contributions.

How CentSense Helps

A prize year is mostly a records problem: what you spent to enter, what you were paid and by whom, and what each document says.

  • Scan entry-fee, shipping and print receipts with AI the day you pay them, categorized to the matching Schedule C line
  • Keep award letters, invitations and 1099s next to the receipts so the character of the payment is documented
  • Log mileage by date for travel to a judging, an exhibition or an award event, with the business purpose written when the trip happens
  • Separate a prize year from your ordinary client income so quarterly estimates reflect the one-time money
  • Export your categorized year as CSV for your CPA when you decide how the payment is reported

CentSense does not decide whether a prize is business income or whether a §74(b) designation was timely. It gives you the records that decision depends on.


Authoritative References

For related reading, see Patreon and Crowdfunding Income on Schedule C, Self-Employment Tax Explained, QBI Deduction for Freelancers and Bunching Deductions.


Keep the paper that decides how a prize is taxed. Start a free CentSense account, scan every entry-fee and shipping receipt with AI, log award-trip miles by date, and export a CPA-ready category breakdown at tax time. The free tier includes 10 AI receipt scans a month, no credit card required, and the Solo plan is $5/month for unlimited scans, mileage tracking and CSV export.


This guide is general education for U.S. freelancers filing in 2026. It is not personalized tax advice. Whether a prize is a recognition award or business income, whether a §74(b) designation was timely and complete, and whether a fellowship qualifies under §117 turn on facts a CPA or EA should confirm, and the worked example is federal only and assumes the stated facts.

Related reads

Continue learning with more tax and expense guides for freelancers.

Compare alternatives

See how CentSense stacks up to other expense and receipt tools for freelancers.